------- Additional Comments From pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com  2005-06-02 
18:46 -------
Does this need to be reopened?  I see the following for mainline.

  -m32:
.L4:
        slwi %r9,%r11,1  #, tmp130, i
        addi %r11,%r11,1         # i, i,
        sthx %r0,%r9,%r10        #* q.1, tmp132
        bdnz .L4         #



  -m64:
.L4:
        sthx %r0,%r11,%r10       #* ivtmp.11, tmp132
        addi %r10,%r10,2         # ivtmp.11, ivtmp.11,
        bdnz .L4         #


Both can be improved to use a non-indexed store and increment of that base reg,
similar to what Zdenek said he saw in comment #9.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18431

Reply via email to