------- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2005-05-22 21:13 ------- Subject: Re: missed optimization due with const function and pulling out of loops
> > Nevertheless, even if we are very strict with the definition, moving > > get_type2 out of the loop is not a good idea, since get_type2 might > > potentially be very expensive (and we have no way how to determine > > that this is not the case), thus we would lose in case get_type2 > > should be never executed. > > > > > > Don't we attempt to detect zero trip loops? > (If not, we should :P) I don't see how this is relevant to the PR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21712
