------- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19
14:48 -------
A 20050513 dump shows:
...
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-13/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:171:
note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-13/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:72:
note: vectorized 1 loops in function.
foo (n)
...
20050517 shows:
...
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-17-orv/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:171:
note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-17-orv/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:72:
note: vectorized 2 loops in function.
foo (n)
...
So, the test fails because we don't vectorize the expected number (1)of loops -
we vectorize more. I suppose we should change the target patterns for the
scan-tree-dump-times tests.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dpatel at apple dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21630
