------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 22:54 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > where ENTRY no longer falls into block 0, but is expected to jump to block > 12. Expand has no > idea such a thing is possible and falls through anyway. While it's not > obvious in 4.0 branch, the > addition of a verify_flow_info failure in mainline makes it apparent this is > not supposed to happen. If you turn on checking it will fail on the 4.0 branch.
-- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21562
