------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-14 06:30 ------- (In reply to comment #11)
> Ralf, it looks like no working integer type is found when building the > compiler. The h8300 is special wrt. integer types: >From a test script of mine: ... checking for char... yes checking size of char... 1 checking for short... yes checking size of short... 2 checking for int... yes checking size of int... 2 checking for long... yes checking size of long... 4 checking for long long... yes checking size of long long... 8 checking for float... yes checking size of float... 4 checking for double... yes checking size of double... 4 checking for long double... yes checking size of long double... 4 checking for void*... yes checking size of void*... 2 checking for int*... yes checking size of int*... 2 checking for long*... yes checking size of long*... 2 checking for __int8_t... yes checking size of __int8_t... 1 checking for __int16_t... yes checking size of __int16_t... 2 checking for __int32_t... yes checking size of __int32_t... 4 checking for __int64_t... yes checking size of __int64_t... 8 checking for int8_t... yes checking size of int8_t... 1 checking for int16_t... yes checking size of int16_t... 2 checking for int32_t... yes checking size of int32_t... 4 checking for int64_t... yes checking size of int64_t... 8 checking whether CHAR_BIT is declared... yes checking for bits in char... 8 Note: int8, int16, int32 and int64 all are available, it's just that the "usual" (bogus) assumptions * short==16bit * int==32bit * sizeof(void*)==sizeof(long) do not apply. Also note: This is a 16bit target, sizeof(void*)==16bit. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21203
