------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 02:25 ------- Re-opening. A re-organization of the tree optimizers is causing us to misdiagnose this test case once again. I am going to work on a better warning implementation that doesn't get confused so easily.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00955.html -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
