On Friday 06 May 2005 09:01 am, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 6 May 2005, Bruce Korb wrote: > > > That is, indeed, very bizarre. I opened that file and the lines that > > are supposed to be continued with backslashes ended with: \\\n\ > > which is correct. After you extract it, you have: \\\\\n\ > > which is not correct. I am at a loss as to what to suggest. > > Are you sure you aren't confusing the lines in > apzAab_Fd_Zero_Asm_Posix_Types_HPatch (with \\\n\) with those in > apzAab_Fd_Zero_Gnu_Types_HPatch (with \\\\\n\)?
Oops. Yes. That is exactly what I was doing. Sorry. Those are remarkably similar patches. Fixed. Thank you - Bruce
