------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-05-02 19:02
-------
Confirmed. However, this has really low priority: the C++ standard is not
a superset of the C99 standard, so a number of things new to C99 are not
part of C++, and this is one of them. If you want to write portable code,
you should use the std::complex class. If you have cases where you can show
that std::complex is slower than using the C99 means, we'd be happy to
accept bug reports.
Thanks
Wolfgang
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |minor
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Known to fail| |2.95.3 3.2.3 3.3.1 3.3.4
| |3.4.3 4.0.0
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-02 19:02:48
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21057
