------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-27 09:37 ------- Yes, you are right, but I don't want to fiddle too much with that constant, in particular risking to change its size (the standard doesn't guarantee that the underlying type of that anonymous enum is int), seems safer just changing the enum to be named.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21244
