------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-04-25 15:35 ------- Subject: Re: MATMUL failing with ALLOCATED matrices, unless base indices given
>> The question remains: What to do with the offset field? >> Fix it in the front end for static arrays, or remove it >> altogether? > > The offset field is used for something like this: > REAL, POINTER :: a(:), c(:) > REAL, TARGET :: b(25) > a => b(5:) > c => a(3:) > end > Nonetheless, matmul is the only case where this assertion is imposed in the m4 functions. It doesn't do anything, except assert the "pathological case". I was going to consider all the variants tonight, including your example. Your message has spurred me on. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18857
