------- Additional Comments From ltg at zes dot uni-bremen dot de 2005-04-15 05:25 ------- Subject: RE: [4.0 RC1] Bootstrap failure (ld: TOC overflow)
On 15-Apr-2005 pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu wrote: > > It is already done for BOOT_LDFLAGS. OK. I configured now with: BOOT_LDFLAGS="-Wl,-bbigtoc" CC="/usr/local/bin/gcc -maix64" CFLAGS="-O9 -maix64 -maltivec -mabi=altivec" CXXFLAGS="-g -O9 -maix64 -maltivec -mabi=altivec" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-O9 -maix64 -maltivec -mabi=altivec" LIBCFLAGS="-g -O9 -maix64 -maltivec -mabi=altivec" LIBCXXFLAGS="-g -O9 -maix64 -maltivec -mabi=altivec" /devel/build/gcc-4.0.0-20050410/configure --enable-threads=aix --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --disable-nls --enable-libgcj-debug --enable-libgcj-multifile --with-x --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats --enable-languages=c,c++,f95,java,objc and built with: BOOT_CFLAGS="-O9 -maix64" BOOT_LDFLAGS="-Wl,-bbigtoc" CFLAGS="-O9 -maix64" CXXFLAGS="-O9 -maix64" LIBCFLAGS="-g -O9 -maix64" LIBCXXFLAGS="-g -O9 -maix64 -fno-implicit-templates" nohup /usr/local/bin/make bootstrap& and it seems that BOOT_LDFLAGS is completely ignored by the build process, resulting in the same TOC overflow. Lothar ---------------------------------- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 15-Apr-2005 Time: 05:44:28 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21037
