------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-04-15 05:07 ------- Subject: Re: Intrinisc function SPREAD is broken
> > >This appears to fix the benchmark in question. > > > I believe that reshape needs the same/similar fix. Is ret->data = NULL guaranteed for temporaries? This is what I would have done but the question that I asked on the original PR is still unanswered - is it the caller or the callee who should be arranging the correct amount of memory for a temporary object? Paul T -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18495
