------- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-14 
17:21 -------
Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail

On Apr 12, 2005, Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> !             v->ignore = 1;

What's the point of the statement above?  If we actually know the giv
reg has the right value, why not use it for other purposes as well?



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20126

Reply via email to