------- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-04-13 09:58 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Uros, what's the state of this bug? I don't understand if the patch linked in > comment #6 was committed, or which is its final version still pending > review/approval.
Another approach was suggested by Roger Sayle in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02017.html. We would force CONST_DOUBLE to memory only if (newly created) combined instruction with CONST_DOUBLE operand doesn't match. However, this approach requires some more hacking, and I havn't look into it (yet...?). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19150
