------- Additional Comments From sebor at roguewave dot com 2005-04-11 17:51 ------- Yes, I read that comment but I still don't see anything in the standard the footnote is in conflict with and I don't see it on the WG14 DR list(*). If the footnote is bogus and va_list can't be universally implemented to allow programs to initialize a va_list* with the address of a va_list function argument,it ought to be taken out of the standard. If you are not aware of an issue against the C standard I'll be happy to send it to the committee myself.
(*) http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/summary.htm -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20951
