------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
17:07 -------
Nope this is invalid, see PR 14557 for more discussion about this issue.
&va is equivalent to &va[0] on x86_64 since va_list is defined as an array on
x86_64.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14557 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c |target
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20951
