------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-04-08 14:20 ------- Subject: Re: operator-(const T&, const complex<T>&) vs operator-(const complex<T>&, const complex<T>&)
"kreckel at ginac dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | (In reply to comment #15) | > Well, Richard, numerical analysis is not a game, ... | | Right, but a logical argument is not a game. IT may be a "word ame" though :-) | > x - (z + i * w) -> (x - z) + i * (-w) | > | > We cannot disregard that, I think: before implementing something else we | > should at least try to understand why "LIA-3" mandates that. | | Indeed. Has that standard been released yet? It is not released yet. | What's the exact reference, and | is there some public access, maybe to drafts? I think you can have it on WG11 web-site, go to www.open-std.org. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758
