------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 16:57 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The workaround is trivial. But I'm still confused as to what exactly causes > gcc > to treat unnamed enums so much differently that named ones. It would be great > if > I could get some clarity on this. I have a handful of cases like this in the > openoffice.org code base and OOo is reluctant to take the patches to fix > unless > sure it's currently invalid.
Because the standard treats them differently. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20589
