------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-19
14:03 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> But according the standard, 'const static' data members of an intergral type
> can
> now be initialized _inside_ their class. In this case, the initialization is
> _also_ a definition, so _no_ further definitions are reuquired outside the
> class
> body.
No it is not a definition, a definition (or is it the other way around). Still
this is invalid. Yes the compiler
is allowed to "optimize" the constant which is why it worked in 2.95.3 (well
because the defintion of
push_back was wrong).
Oh, one more thing, the vector code is equivalent to (so you take the address):
struct T
{
static char const a = 3;
};
void
fff(const char &a){ }
int
main()
{
fff(T::a);
return 0;
}
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20547
