------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:40 -------
I take that back, this is invalid code still, the typename keyword is not valid
outside of a template.
Reduced testcase:
template<class> struct f {};
f<int> f2[2] = {typename f<int>()};
This is a regression from 3.3.3. We should be able to recover much better in
3.4.0 than we did in 3.3.3
but we don't. In fact I would have assumed that we would get a better error
message before ICEing.
Even though in the full testcase we don't get an error, we do in the reduced
testcase though:
t.cc:3: error: expected nested-name-specifier
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |error-recovery, ice-on-
| |invalid-code
Known to fail| |3.4.0 4.1.0
Known to work| |3.3.3
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-05 19:40:09
date| |
Summary|ICE |[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE
| |on invalid code, typename
| |outside of a template
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20333
