------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25
16:48 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> I've confirmed on this other machine that the update caused the same breakage.
>
Ah, yes. I see it now. The reorg tickled a bug in the renamer:
# n_21 = V_MUST_DEF <n_18>
n = D.1158_28
...
n_48 = PHI <n_37, n21>
<L2>:
...
# VUSE <n_21>
n.5_40 = n;
That's wrong. The last VUSE should be VUSE <n_48>. Virtual operands should
always be in FUD-chain form.
Working on a fix.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20204
