------- Additional Comments From stevenj at fftw dot org 2005-02-23 20:44 ------- Subject: Re: COMPLEX function returns incompatible with g77
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Well chaning to be more target's C like (because that is what gfortran > uses now) ABI. If you're breaking backwards ABI compatibility anyway, which does not seem like a decision to take lightly, clean up everything at once. e.g. you want to get rid of f2c cruft, why not make -fno-second-underscore the default as well? (Despite the gcc manual's claims, no non-GNU compilers that I know of append 2 underscores to external names with underscores, at least any more. Almost all of them, e.g. SGI, Intel ifc, Portland, Tru64, ..., append a single underscore in all cases. IBM xlf and HP/UX append no underscores at all.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20178
