------- Additional Comments From wwieser at gmx dot de 2005-02-20 00:49 ------- Subject: Re: Unresolved dependent "static const" symbol in template
On Sunday 20 February 2005 01:34, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Yes you need to have declare the storage for the static variables (even > though they are constant you still need the storage area, for an example if > you take the address of the variable where is the storage of the variable > if you have not declared it). > Thanks for pointing out. Then I agree that it is a missed optimization which previous versions from 3.4 up to some weeks ago in 4.0 still were able to perform. Wolfgang -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20098
