------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-16 13:35 ------- Subject: Re: warn on parameter name mismatch
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, cyeoh at samba dot org wrote: > I think it would be fairly unusual that you would want the prototype parameter > names to not match the definition. It wouldn't have to warn if the parameter > names in the prototype were deliberately omitted. I think it's quite usual for a header to use a parameter name in a reserved namespace (whether the implementation namespace as in glibc headers, or beginning with a prefix reserved by a library). In such a case, the library implementation is likely to use a shorter more convenient name for the parameter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19994
