------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-06 17:14 ------- (In reply to comment #1)
- as I'm curious as to what the "proper" interpretation/handling of target dependant constant value casts should be; it seems that in the provided example, the optimized transformations of 0xffffffff to an (int)-1 intermediate value in bar & baz are consistent, assuming: (((0xffffffff) >> ((sizeof(int) * BITS_PER_UNIT)) & 1) however would have expected the comparison between a & b in baz to have been optimized away; is this a reasonable expectation? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19788
