------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2005-01-28 
17:08 -------
Francois-Xavier Coudert's comment is spot on.  Reducing the optimisation to -O0 
removes the need for this peculiar fix.

We could do with a repository for funnies that are not quite bugs.  I SAY 
REMOVE THIS ONE.

I am still left bemused, as I accidently posted in french, by the fact that a 
print statement releases the programme for any optimisation level and that when 
the section of code is isolated it runs perfectly.  Does anybody have an 
explanation?  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18714

Reply via email to