------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-01-28 17:08 ------- Francois-Xavier Coudert's comment is spot on. Reducing the optimisation to -O0 removes the need for this peculiar fix.
We could do with a repository for funnies that are not quite bugs. I SAY REMOVE THIS ONE. I am still left bemused, as I accidently posted in french, by the fact that a print statement releases the programme for any optimisation level and that when the section of code is isolated it runs perfectly. Does anybody have an explanation? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18714