------- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-01-27 07:14 ------- Subject: Re: Redundant instructions in loop optimization
On Thursday 27 January 2005 07:05, rth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 > 06:05 ------- Steven, you do realize this is essentially unfixable without > a new pass that optimially places widened operations, don't you? No, I didn't :-) So you suggest closing this as SUSPEND? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17387
