I had originally thought about clearing the resources entirely, but I felt it would limit what I could do with maps. With the way they are now, I can keep control over how much land is available to be built on and how many map entrances exist that allow Goblins in. Because you don't directly control your lumberjacks, miners, and stone masons, it would be quite unfair to realize they had just cleared away some new spot and Goblins were now pouring into your land from a brand new spot. I do also like being able to force people to spend more time planning out where is best to build. If land cleared, I very much doubt anyone would ever need to worry about positioning their buildings around the geography of the map.
> I'm asking out of just being curious > here. With lumberjacks, why don't they > cut down all the trees? I've noticed in a few games > that I'll go from > forest/dense forest to scattered trees in an area. > I'd think if everything > was cut down then it would go to land where you could build > something on it. > Just a thought. --- Gamers mailing list __ [email protected] If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected]. You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org. All messages are archived and can be searched and read at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list, please send E-mail to [email protected].
