I realize this discussion is drifting away from fvwm, but... ...a major part of my daily activity has always depended on X11's ability to function on remote displays. Does that functionality (i.e. "DISPLAY=remotehost:0" vs. "DISPLAY=:0") exist if either or both of the hosts is based on Wayland?
paul ml-f...@srv.mx wrote: > Also a bunch of new DE/WM and soon XFCE. There will still be diversity, > but a new one. > However I'm not sure Xorg will be out soon there are still missing > features on Wayland, like screen recording (available only on Gnome), > which means that softwares like OBS don't work on it. > > Le 02/02/2024 à 04:28, hw a écrit : > > On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 14:02 -0700, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:25 PM hw <h...@adminart.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> so is there finally a version that works for wayland? > >>> > >> No, fvwm only works with xorg and most likely won't be ported. > >> > >>> What are the differences between fvwm2 and fvwm3? > >>> > >> See https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm3/discussions/878 > > > > Good pointer, thanks! > > > > It's a pity that there's no fvwm for wayland. Xorg doesn't seem to be > > maintainted anymore and is on the way out. That only leaves us Gnome > > and KDE. All the diversity we used to have is gone with that. > > > > > =---------------------- paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 38.9 degrees)
