Hi Thomas, On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:35PM +0200 Thomas Adam wrote: > Because many different image formats to support is just code for code's > sake. The trick is determining which one is best-suited to the things fvwm > has to offer. In my mind, I may bring back SVGs, say. But XPMs and XBMs? > No, I _really_ would rather not. Converting images where necessary is > trivial to do. When would you bring back SVG support? Because then I can test mvwm with FNS. Could be interesting for parsing ^^
Best, Thomas
