Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: > So I don't want idle speculation or wonder to permeate the work I'm doing, > the only thing FVWM will benefit from this will be bug-fixes, and I've > already identified a few memory leaks. It's nice for FVWM in a way, it's > being audited for free as a result of this work.
Is the code currently in the repo on github "useful"? "Useful" would mean that one could compile it and use it instead of fvwm. I`m all for removing cruft and better efficiency, and I appreciate your effort and would be happy if I could help. -- Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power.
