Vincent W. Chen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Before the current version in Debian unstable (2.6.5), when a user
> starts fvwm with no config file, the default from
> /etc/X11/fvwm/system.fvwm2rc would be used instead. The intention
> seems to be to offer users a more usable starting config with which to
> customize[1]. However, according to Thomas in bug #598948 [2], this
> differs from the upstream behavior, causes support problems upstream,
> and is currently undocumented.
> 
> Personally, I would like to remove this behavior, since I do not use
> the default config myself and probably won't have time to maintain it.
> I also think fvwm by nature is configurable and is meant to be
> modified, so providing a default, Debian specific config doesn't make
> much sense to me.
> 
> So I'd like to ask any Debian FVWM users whether you rely on this
> behavior or find it useful: when starting fvwm with no user config,
> the default from /etc/X11/fvwm/system.fvwm2rc is used instead. If
> people want to keep this then I will reintroduce this in unstable,
> with this behavior documented somewhere. If not, then I'll just close
> the bug.
> 
> P.S. Should I also ask this on debian-user? Not sure where Debian FVWM
> users congregate...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Vincent Chen
> 
> [1]  From the changelog by the previous maintainer Manoj:
> 
>   * [58b579f]: [debiandir:fvwm]: Add a system.fvwm2rc file back
>     After 5 years, Debian reintroduces the default system configuration
>     file for fvwm, system.fvwm2rc, back to the distribution. But instead
>     of the old, ugly, mostly low usability default configuratgion, this
>     configuration file is derived from a flattened theme from fvwm-
>     themes, and uses most of the modern conventions of new fvwm
>     (colorsets, etc). The new system.fvwm2rc file also suports teh Debian
>     menusystem, and can serve as a decent starting point for modification
>     -- and should easily be converted into a fvwm theme again.
> 
>  -- Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org>  Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:41:42 -0500
> 
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598948



If you ask me:

Debian Lenny didn't come with this feature. It exists since
Squeeze. I really became aware of this change 8 days ago (last
Saturday), and because it does not provide any benefit for me,
I will not use it (I have my own config anyway).

  Another change between Lenny and Squeeze is that I have to
  add 3 additional lines into my own config to get the Debian
  menu as used in Lenny, but this is slightly irrelevant
  to your question.

I had remarked last week that this standard config file
could be organized in a more modular style for my taste.
So, the current (Squeeze) version does not even have the
benefit to be a very useful blueprint for an own config
file, because it lacks of modularity (a requirement for
comprehensibility).

So, I will not miss it if you trash it.

My humble opinion about this :-)
- Michael -

Reply via email to