On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:22:41AM -0500, MK wrote: > WRT asciidoc, Thomas mentions stuff "within the Documentation/ > directory", but I don't know what this refers to (there is no such > directory in the 2.6.4 source). In any case, I would think that it > should not be hard to parse/scrape/whatever the existing docs into a > NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION pattern, rather than do it all manually.
Umm, I mentioned this in a previous reply to this thread. Please read that. -- Thomas Adam
