Michael Großer <michael.gros...@gmx.de> writes: > Thomas Adam wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:27:51PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> > I think, because of this, a default configuration is not that important. > I think, a better idea could be to leave the default config as minimal > as it is, and instead of changing the default config, better invest > some time into an idea of offering some example configurations for > new FVWM users.
Fvwm offers 2 sample configs. Options 1 and 2 on the built in menu. The first was my effort from a very long time ago. The second gives you a "windows 95" like configuration. Perhaps more work could be done in that area. I never liked 2 ways to do this. Perhaps option 1 could do a better job of creating a taskbar like configuration. -- Dan Espen
