> On 20 October 2011 09:13, Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:51:59AM -0700, elliot s wrote: > >> Version 2.6.3: > >> Previous versions only added the "(%t)" when there was a repeated name. > >> The new code always adds it. > > > > This is not a bug, but rather very much by deliberate design. =A0The old = > logic > > tried to do this before but failed, and when I refactored everything I > > fixed it. =A0So this is how it's going to be with %t from now on. > > i too liked the original behavior. Can you add it back please? Its not > good that you reimplement features and remove functionality at the > same time. How is this not a bug precisely?
It would seem you have not read the man page! ;-) Thank you Thomas for, yet again, fixing a bug so that fvwm behaves as specified.
