Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 06:45:54PM -0500, des...@verizon.net wrote: >> I made a proposal for a lighter fvwm themes but it was turned down. > > I can't say that's surprising -- I bet it was a good idea as well which is > probably why it got turned down.
I wouldn't go that far. All the developers past and present are very smart. I never went for FvwmThemes myself, it loads way too much stuff. Looking around, it looks like what I actually did was check in 2 decors and a switcher as part of sample.fvwmrc. See decor_examples, DecorMwm, and DecorWin95. The basic idea is that each decor file sets a decor and defines a function that removes the decor. As I remember, the complaint was that it was too primitive. I can't argue with that. But I use it and provide it to a group of users at work with no complaints. >> That times roman font is ugly too. > > Nah. Confer: > > Style * Font 6x10 > > ;) Actually, I use 9x15bold, so I like the appearance but I need something larger and more visible.