Jason Timrod <jtim...@yahoo.com> writes: > Hi, >
> I was googling for "fvwm stable" and noticed that many people > recommended 2.5 version, which is listed as "unstable" on the fvwm > website. The 2.5 branch is unstable in the sense that new features could change in an incompatible way. It's fine to use. > > Is this still a good version to use? Yes. > I also read about a 2.6 release. Where do I find this one? I dont > think I saw it on the fvwm website. 2.6 is a future release, often discussed.
