David Chanters <david.chant...@googlemail.com> writes: > On 18 March 2010 22:47, Glyn Millington <g...@millingtons.org> wrote: >> David Chanters <david.chant...@googlemail.com> writes: >> >>> On 18 March 2010 07:10, Glyn Millington <g...@millingtons.org> wrote: >>>> Well in that case why not start a fork?! Call it fvwmBP (bug-preserver) >>>> Go back to the last release which contained your preferred behaviour and >>>> go from there - the source is available after all, this is open-source >>>> software. For Thomas to revert just to preserve your favourite bug would >>>> be silly - but YOU can do it if you like - isn't freedom wonderful? :-) >>> >>> what steps in cvs would i need to do this please? where do i host it as >>> well? >> >> Instructions for cvs are here >> >> http://www.fvwm.org/documentation/dev_cvs.php > > i meant how do i use cvs to revert this silly fix to get the behavior i want?
You work it out yourself. Or you go to ftp://ftp.fvwm.org/pub/fvwm/version-2/ and you go back a release or two, before this bug was fixed. Simple. You are asking (rudely) for a reversion which no-one else seemingly wants. The maintainer has given his reasons for not wishing to revert the bugfix. Seems to me you either put up (code) or just put up with it. atb Glyn
