Le Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:12:15 +0200 Walid Nouh <[email protected]> a écrit:
>Le 06/09/2010 21:49, Fabrice Flore-Thebault a écrit : >> I propose this reorganisation of the display of the projects in the >> forge : >> >> + FusionInventory Agent >> ++ agent-tools >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-backup >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-fai >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-ltsp >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-opsi >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-netdiscovery >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-ocsdeploy >> ++ fusioninventory-agent-task-snmpquery >> + FusionInventory for GLPI >> ++ plugin_fusinvdeploy >> ++ plugin_fusinvinventory >> ++ plugin_fusinvsnmp >> + Libfusioninventory-server-php >> + Fusioninventory Community >> + Documentation >> >> >> >I agree with you. It looks better in this configuration >> - Remove empty project "FusionInventory Server" which has no utility >> >> - Question : should we keep "Fusioninventory-ldap" which is still >> empty ? I would prefer we unpublish it and create it again when >> development is starting, so it becomes clear that the project has >> really started. >> >> >and where to put it ? what you should this project do ? >Walid. I think it must be an option of agent to get config in LDAP instead from registry or config file. So this LDAP project must be deleted, Benoît (bilbo the turtle) confirm it please. David _______________________________________________ Fusioninventory-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fusioninventory-devel
