On 2014-09-25 09:14, Tony Arcieri wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Michal Zalewski <lcam...@coredump.cx>
wrote:
In what way? It doesn't have a logo, so it's a bit better in my book.
That's where you're wrong:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ByVh24fCcAAy7mT.png
I propose a contest - IMO if Heartbleed got a cool logo/symbol,
ShellShock deserves at least 4 or 5 designs to choose from.
http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-With_Shockwaves-With_Text.JPG
http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-With_Shockwaves-Without_Text.JPG
http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-Without_Shockwaves-With_Text.JPG
http://www.beneaththewaves.net/ShellShock-Without_Shockwaves-Without_Text.JPG
Maybe MITRE can be convinced to add a "logo URL" field to CVE entries? :)
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
