Should it be better to include the Advisory Details/exploit/code in the
body of the email to FD, and not in a link to a blog/site/company so the
list archive will be an archive and not a index to some, possible down,
link?
I saw some reports using this format. It is good for a blog or site
traffic, but in time, if that sites/blog/entry is deleted or down, the
de FD archive (and its mirrors) will point to nothing usefull.
I am wrong or it is a good idea?
Sorry for my poor english.
_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
