On 10 apr. 2014, at 00:32, Craig Holmes <cr...@rideaunetworks.com> wrote:
> On April 8, 2014 10:21:34 AM Matthew Musingo wrote: >> Even if your systems were patched an attacker could have already attained >> the secrets. >> >> Certs and other sensitive information need to be reconsidered for >> replacement or changed > How realistic is it that an attacker would be able to glean passwords through > this vulnerability? Programatically searching through 64k memory dumps for > certificates seems plausible, but looking for passwords does not. A password > is > of no pre-determined length or format. So unless you know what strings are > wrapped around it (and those strings are reliably presented), isn't the loss > of some types of sensitive information.... unlikely? >From poking at a very popular free e-mail service that only recently patched, here's an example of some of the data that got returned: /config/pwtoken_get?src=emailimap&ts=12345&login=foo&passwd=bar& As you can see, figuring out what strings are wrapped around it is trivial and I am assuming that there are people out there who did nothing but trying to extract this information in an automized way. Cookies too got passed this way. Change your passwords :) Menso _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
