Some will say it's best to let them go down by themselves (they will probably be blacklisted if it's the attack rate from their network is growing and they don't care about it).
For eg: OVH, an French ISP is getting blacklisted by some mailing providers because of the spam rate coming from their network. Well, they started taking measure by punishing customers that do it and they deployed solutions to watch the problem. It's an old story ... Who's accountable ? The network owner or the hacked server ? My point of view is : if you own a network, you have to watch out that your users are not using it to take down other networks / servers. If your customer want to screw the Internet or cannot secure its stuff, they should get their own AS. On 23 October 2013 23:58, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:05 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > What's the deal with plusserver.de and ecatel.net? I get scanned > constantly > > from these netblocks.. > > > you say this like getting scanned is a problem. > > if getting scanned is a problem for you, > the internets are a problem for you! > > > > translation: bitching like this means you're doing it wrong... > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
