> Freedom of speech and freedom of anonymous speech is protected by the first > amendment..
There is nothing anywhere in any of US law, whether it be the bill of rights or case law/judicial review which *modifies* those rights. More over, you probably mean to reference the 4th amendment, not the 1st, as having a given type of speech monitoring does not inhibit its expression, but may/may not constitute an illegal search and seizure. This will eventually be reviewed by SCOTUS, to which we will determine whether its constitutional or not. That's how it works here, despite what people yelling about knowing their rights think. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:01 AM, laurent gaffie <[email protected]> wrote: > Freedom of speech and freedom of anonymous speech is protected by the first > amendment.. > > https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity > > > > > 2013/6/11 Philip Whitehouse <[email protected]> >> >> >> Seems like some people spend way to much time focusing on the second >> amendment rather than the first one... >> >> Well this relates mainly to the fourth amendment, not the first. The first >> tends to get decent coverage. Publication of the leak by journalists is the >> only under the realm of the first. >> >> Philip Whitehouse > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
