>From a security standpoint, I agree with you, but whether their using public or private IPs the problem is the same, but this was a routing question .. and I see no problem with their using 'private' IPs on their 'inside' routing gear so long as they give me a routable public IP on my gateway device.
Gary Baribault Courriel: [email protected] GPG Key: 0x685430d1 Fingerprint: 9E4D 1B7C CB9F 9239 11D9 71C3 6C35 C6B7 6854 30D1 On 05/17/2013 04:37 PM, sec wrote: > On 2013-05-17 16:17:35 (-0400), Gary Baribault wrote: >> The only problem is that anyone on a cable modem could access their >> 10.x.x.x/8 address space and frankly who cares. > > Me, if they're still not signing (much less encrypting) packets on the > local loop, and continuing to wish real hard that no one builds serial > or other debug ports---or board headers for same---into "certified" > cable modems. > > I have a Verizon Wireless femtocell with what looks like an HDMI port > on the bottom, but *probably* isn't. I've been afraid to experiment, > for fear of what I'd find. Embedded device security continues to amuse > / terrify. > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
