Good point. Makes me wonder though how many people realize that ZDi and such are third parties..... On Dec 8, 2011 9:47 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:24:21 -0300, Pablo Ximenes said: > > 2011/12/8 Michal Zalewski <[email protected]> > > > If you don't like it, let us know how to improve it. You also always > > > have the option of not researching vulnerabilities in these platforms; > > > going with the full-disclosure approach; or selling the flaws to a > > > willing third party. > > > Well, selling flaws to third parties might be considered a crime in some > > places, so I would be cautious with that approach. > > I suspect a large portion of the people who are selling flaws to third > parties > are not at all concerned about whether selling the flaw is a crime, as > often the > bigger question is how many crimes were committed in the discovery > process... > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
