yep! next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it. seems, you cannot even wait for the author to do it... as, to wich, i have said... and, i tried to show yu also, ow to simply *catch* it... but, you trying to get code from me, wich, i will never give you :) so to those who care about it, and want to wait, they can then see who is bullshitting who..
I am shocked, howmany socalled 'skilled' people, cannot get this bug to work... but, theyre NOT the ones whining about code :) they probably already doing what I am, making a nice, portable cpp version, wich, wouldnot be hard, if you already know what to start with etc.. so, i guess idscussion, would only assist maliugn use of code, wich i wont have , as a ms user. Sorry but, wen the author likes, he will gief to u. until then , go roll a joint and relax. thx! On 12 November 2011 03:57, Gary Baribault <[email protected]> wrote: > Talk is indeed cheap! > > Gary B > > On 11/11/2011 11:43 AM, Ryan Dewhurst wrote: >> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I >> was thinking at least. >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days >>>> to send a packet, my butt. >>>> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with >>>> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only >>>> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger >>>> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like >>>> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... >>>> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src >>>> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to >>>> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open >>>> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal >>>> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , >>>> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 >>>> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with >>>> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing, >>>> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another.. >>> I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either >>> with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know >>> what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from >>> what I can make of your writing). >>> >>> No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you >>> are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
