You all do realize that continuing this thread with the mail subject as it was, is just providing "free" SEO Sacco right?
On 8/30/11 4:27 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Constantin Kaplinsky > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello Jacqui, >> >>>>>>> Jacqui Caren-home wrote: >> >>> http://www.insecurityresearch.com/files/download/ >>> >>> From the readme's its an old version of metasploit under a wrapper. >>> >>> Also anyone from tightvnc want to see if gpl-violations are interested? >>> >>> INSECT Pro/exploits/framework/msf3/external/source/tightvnc/LICENCE.TXT >>> >>> " GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE >>> Version 2, June 1991 >> >> Do I understand correctly that someone has included GPL-licensed source >> code from TightVNC to their software which is incompatible with GPL? >> >> What is a recommended procedure to stop the violation? > http://www.gnu.org/contact/: If you want to report a free software > license violation that you have found, please read our license > violation page [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-violation.html], and > then contact <[email protected]>. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
