sorry for OT. i am trying to convince a client a bit counterintuitive Coq proof about security is valid.
i can make Coq generate .vo certificates that match the source (human forensic would be happy with this part i suppose). how do i mitigate human forensic analysis of the proof, what the human forensics will look for? any introductory books? what if the proof is big (about 3GB) and computer generated? 10x. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
