Its maker, Israel-based Cellbrite, says it can copy all the content in a cell phone -- including contacts, text messages, call history, and pictures -- within a few minutes. Even deleted texts and other data can be restored by UFED 2.0, the latest version of the product, it says.
http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/04/20/6503253-gadget-gives-cops-quick-access-to-cell-phone-data On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Marcio B. Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Zach C. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Marcio B. Jr. <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Zach C. <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > That only seems to apply to Android 3.x, >>> >>> >>> "only seems to apply" is a sloppy euphemism. >>> >>> Correct sentence is: IT DOES APPLY. >> >> I guess context is for the weak, since Android 2.3 (the latest non-3.x >> version) source is out ( >> http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-releases-gingerbread-source-code-i9000 >> ), and the source was also released for all previous versions -- >> specifically, every version except 3.0. So, it applies to Android 3.0, sure, >> but that's the only version it applies to, and Google indicates they will be >> releasing source when it's actually finished and ready to be released on all >> the platforms Android currently runs on. > > > Alright, you state "context is for the weak" and soon after that, you > agree with me. That's really fantastic, Google-boy. > > >> Well, considering every version prior is more prevalent than 3.0 is, and >> Google will be releasing source... > > > Cut all that enthusiastic mumbo-jumbo crap. > > Say WHEN it's going to happen (if so). When will Honeycomb's sources > be available? > > >> But keep clutching that teddy-bear >> of spiteful vindication that Google didn't release the source code for *one* >> version of Android! > > > This one version happens to be the latest. > > Moreover, I really want to bow to your "proselytism" but I see no > sensible reason for hiding Honeycomb. > > >>> >>> Oh mommy, GSoC rules! Google is so into FOSS! >> >> They sure are. :D > > > Quod erat demonstrandum. > > >>> >>> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Marcio B. Jr. >>> > <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Michael Holstein >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Pretty scary btw. I hope there's not the equivalent for Android. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > anyone can git the android repository and look at the source >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I'm sorry? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/google/google-android-30-honeycomb-open-source-no-more/2845 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Marcio Barbado, Jr. >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Marcio Barbado, Jr. >> >> > > > > Marcio Barbado, Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
